Skip to content
left end
left end
right end

Histopathology review June 2009

Updated  06/04/2010

Questions and answers

What were the allegations?

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust was made aware of concerns about potential misdiagnosis in histopathology between 2000 and 2008. 26 cases over this period were brought to our attention.

These concerns were not limited to any one type of histopathology or to any individual Pathologist.

The position of the board of UH Bristol is that whilst there is no evidence to suggest a significant diagnostic error rate in its histopathology services it is determined to ensure that patients continue to have full confidence in the histopathology services it offers and the board believes that this Inquiry will afford that confidence to patients.

Were the patients involved told about these concerns?

Concerns about the original diagnosis in each case will have been dealt with at the time that they arose between 2000 and 2008, through established clinical procedures.

I am a patient at UH Bristol. In the light of these allegations, how can I be sure of the quality of the Trusts Histopathology service?

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and North Bristol Trust have been working jointly for some years to minimise any procedural obstacles to effective diagnosis. On an ongoing basis, UH Bristol has agreed with NBT that if an issue of concern presents itself to any employee, or is brought to the attention of an employee, they should document those concerns in writing to the appropriate Executive Director to raise formally with the other Trust concerned

In addition, the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust Histopathology Department was fully accredited by Clinical Pathology Accreditation UK Ltd (known as CPA) in April 2009. 

CPA accreditation involves an independent, external audit of the Departments ability to provide a service of high quality by measuring it against defined standards of practice, which are confirmed by peer review.

The Laboratory also participates in national, technical, external quality assurance schemes. All Consultant Histopathologists at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust participate in national, external quality assurance schemes for diagnostic services.

What is University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trusts response to these concerns?

The Trust is confident about the quality of its pathology services and believes that there is no evidence to suggest a significant error rate in Histopathology.

However, the Trust takes concerns over clinical performance extremely seriously and has therefore decided to commission an independent, external review of the histopathology service to establish if there is a significant error rate and identify any areas of concern requiring further action.

Each individual case where concerns have been raised is also being re-examined by two independent pathologists from outside the South West.

What is a significant error rate in Pathology diagnosis?

The Royal College of Pathologists define errors in Histopathology as those errors where two independent Pathologists confirm their disagreement with the original diagnosis.

Published, professional research suggests that a diagnostic error rate between 1% and 2% is within the normal range. Complex cases, in particular, are frequently an issue of opinion rather than definitive diagnosis. A significant error rate would be one that is outside the expected range for the caseload in question. It is important to understand that a pathology report is one input to the diagnosis of a patients condition. Other inputs include the patients medical history, physical examination, results of other investigations such as x-rays and scans, family history and so on.

Where cancer is a possible diagnosis, all this information will be considered by a range of professionals at special multi-disciplinary team meetings specifically designed to identify the best course of treatment for the patient concerned. It is not unusual in complex cases for a range of possible diagnoses to be suggested or for additional pathology opinions to be sought.

Who will be carrying out the audit and how will it be conducted?

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust has taken advice from the Royal College of Pathologists and statistical experts, both inside and outside the Trust, to establish the methodology for an independent review.

An independent organisation has been commissioned to review the individual cases raised as specific concerns and to audit a random sample of 3,500 histopathology cases across all specialties from 2007. Each case will be reviewed by independent specialists from outside the South West of England.

Expert advice was that a random sample of 3,500 cases was sufficiently large to allow statistically significant results to be stratified both by histology type and by individual clinician. The sample will be drawn from specimens taken in 2007 as this is the most recent year about which concerns have been raised.

What will happen with the results of the audit?

The Trust has established an independent review group, which will investigate concerns raised about possible misdiagnosis of histopathology specimens. It will establish what actions were taken by the Trust to address these concerns and decide if those actions were appropriate, timely and sufficient. 

It will also consider the results of the external audit of histopathology specimens and make recommendations on any actions necessary to ensure the Trust provides safe and effective pathology services for patients.

Chair of the review group is Jane Mishcon, Counsel at Hailsham Chambers, London, a barrister with 30 years experience across a wide range of cases involving most clinical specialities.  She has chaired nine independent inquiries and her main area of practice is clinical negligence. Jane is ranked as a leading barrister in both the Legal 500 and Chambers UK.

The other members appointed to the review group are: Sir James Underwood, former Professor of Pathology at the University of Sheffield Medical School; Ken Jarrold CBE, senior consultant at Dearden Consulting and former chief executive of County Durham and Tees Valley Strategic Health Authority.  Dr Margaret Spittle OBE MSc FRCP FRCR AKC, consultant clinical oncologist and emeritus at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Guys & St Thomas Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust replaced Dr Fergus Macbeth, consultant oncologist and Director of the Centre for Clinical Practice at the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence on the panel in January 2010, following Dr Macbeth's decision to stand down due to other work commitments. Following consultation with the Patients Association, Michael Summers, vice chairman of the Patients Association has been appointed as patient representative.

How long will this take?

The audit of samples is completed, it is now being peer reviewed and has been sent to the Royal College of Pathologists for comment. The Independent Inquiry panel has met and has started interviewing witnesses in November 2009.  At this stage we do not know how long the Independent Inquiry will take.  The Trusts main concern is that patient confidence in our histopathology services remains strong and we believe their review will provide patients with any reassurance they need and ensure that any allegations about patient safety are investigated thoroughly.  The Trust is acutely aware of its responsibility to ensure public money is spent wisely and this has been impressed upon the panel.

What if the audit does identify diagnostic errors?

If the audit formally identifies diagnostic errors, the records of the patients concerned will be reviewed by the responsible Consultant to see if their treatment would have been affected in any way.

In the unlikely event that a patients condition is shown to have been adversely affected by a misdiagnosis, they will be invited to a special consultation to discuss the implications.

Who else is involved in this process?

The Trust has informed the two health service regulators, the Care Quality Commission and Monitor (the independent regulator for Foundation Trusts) of the steps it is taking to address these concerns.

NHS Bristol is the co-ordinating Primary Care Trust for University Hospitals Bristol, which means it will take a lead in working with the Trust on behalf of all Primary Care Trusts in the South West to ensure that the public can have confidence in the quality of the Trusts services.

Why arent you releasing details of the cases where misdiagnosis has been alleged?

This information cannot be released for reasons of patient confidentiality. The list of cases includes medical details which may personally identify patients.

How are you ensuring that the panel is fully Independent?

Whom the panel members wish to interview is for them to decide, the Trust has placed no restriction on who they may approach.  The Trust has instructed Verita to manage the administration of the Inquiry.

I would like to give evidence, how do I do that?

If you wish to give evidence, please contact Verita, who are coordinating the Inquiry independently of the Trust. Please telephone 0207 494 5670, or email enquiries@verita.net

What is histopathology?

Histopathology (or histology) is the branch of pathology which concerns the analysis of human tissue for diagnostic purposes.

How many Histopathology specimens does University Hospital Bristol deal with each year?

The Trust deals with an average of 18,500 adult histopathology requests each year, excluding cervical cytology, of which around 10% are referred by GPs and 90 % by consultants.

Why is the audit being conducted now if concerns were raised before?

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and NBT have been working together since 2008 to establish the basis for a joint review into Histopathology services by the Royal College of Pathologists.

However, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust has now moved to commission an independent review of its own service since allegations have been published in the media which may undermine public confidence in the quality of those services.

What if I have personal concerns and want to discuss them?

Please call the following number to discuss any concerns you may have: 0117 342 2050.